Re: devfs - why not ?

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Wed Apr 12 2000 - 18:35:14 EST


Followup to: <20000412162328.A2068@alcove.wittsend.com>
By author: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I'm "on the fence". It makes my life simpler with things like the
> device drivers I work on (getting them to show up in /dev - the Computone
> Multiport drivers can create 520 separate devices when fully loaded) but
> there are a lot of gotcha's where the fix (like taring up devices to
> preserve permissions and symlinks at boot and halt) is just a butt-ugly
> kludge.
>

So instead there are 520 separate chunks of kernel memory... a device
driver I'm hacking on right now is about 3x the size with devfs
support than without (not to mention I can't find any documentation on
the devfs kernel API, so I just gave up.)

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST