Re: inline API documentation formats (was: devfs - why not ?)

From: Tim Waugh (twaugh@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 08:35:38 EST

Next message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Previous message: Marek Habersack: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: inline API documentation formats (was: devfs - why not ?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 13 Apr 2000, Matthias Andree wrote:

> How does that format and output compare to Doxygen?
>
> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/

(URL corrected)

Doxygen can't output DocBook, as far as I can see. Also, the inline
documentation markup doesn't seem as simple (both a disadvantage and an
advantage).

Tim.
*/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Previous message: Marek Habersack: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: inline API documentation formats (was: devfs - why not ?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST