Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk> writes:
> You gave the definition as "the application does not need the data in
> the near future". If it were ok to nuke the data, the definition would
> say "the application does not need the data".
THere is no problem because the OS will recover. I don't say it's an
optimal implementation but given that the name is used differently on
different OSes (at least the one without the POSIX_ prefix) people
will have to adjust themselves.
Of course I would prefer if the option in the Linux kernel could do
what POSIX says and simply add a new option for the current behaviour.
But nobody listens to me anyway so why bother.
-- ---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST