Re: Proposal "LUID"

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Sat Apr 15 2000 - 10:07:03 EST

Next message: Oystein Viggen: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Previous message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
In reply to: Linda Walsh: "Proposal "LUID""
Next in thread: Linda Walsh: "Re: Proposal "LUID""
Reply: Linda Walsh: "Re: Proposal "LUID""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Linda Walsh wrote:

>[..] could impact programs
>that depend on the internal structure of the kernel's task struct. [..]

Programs must not depend on the internal structure of the task struct.
Only entry.S depends on it partially.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Oystein Viggen: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Previous message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
In reply to: Linda Walsh: "Proposal "LUID""
Next in thread: Linda Walsh: "Re: Proposal "LUID""
Reply: Linda Walsh: "Re: Proposal "LUID""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:26 EST