Re: PCMCIA IRQ broken by new IRQ router in 2.3.99-pre5

From: Martin Mares (mj@suse.cz)
Date: Sat Apr 15 2000 - 17:42:19 EST

Next message: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Previous message: Richard Gooch: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
In reply to: Andrew Pam: "Re: PCMCIA IRQ broken by new IRQ router in 2.3.99-pre5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

> Yes, compiling the PCMCIA as modules rather than in the kernel (I couldn't
> find how to specify options with it compiled into the kernel) and
> putting "PCIC_OPTS=irq_mask=0xfff8" into /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia does work:

I meant "pci=irqmask=0xfff8" _kernel_ boot option, not the pcmcia one.
Can you try that, please?

Have a nice fortnight

-- Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> <mj@suse.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ "The first myth of management is that it exists."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Previous message: Richard Gooch: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
In reply to: Andrew Pam: "Re: PCMCIA IRQ broken by new IRQ router in 2.3.99-pre5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST