Re: Proposal "LUID"

From: allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
Date: Sun Apr 16 2000 - 14:20:00 EST


On 15 Apr, Jamie Lokier wrote:
+-----
| Linda Walsh wrote:
| > I'm not talking about limits. I'm talking about an
| > auditting ID that needs to be based on a when a user logs in
| > and stays with them over any SUID or 'su' commands.
|
| "telnet localhost" subverts this if you allow it (but you probably wouldn't).
|
| This shows that you have to audit and possibly restrict all daemons that
| permit uid changes anyway.
|
| So why not just use the time-honoured "real user id"?
+--->8

I think you're misunderstanding; this is a "new idea" only for Linux.
LUIDs are part of CAPP, which used to be called "C2" security. IOW
it's an existing standard, and one that some places insist on.

-- 
brandon s. allbery	   os/2,linux,solaris,perl	allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator	   kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt	  allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering			kf8nh
    We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:09 EST