Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?

From: sara@procsys.com
Date: Tue Apr 18 2000 - 10:05:37 EST

Next message: sara@procsys.com: "Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?"
Previous message: Jonathan Case Nicklin: "Re: namei() query"
Next in thread: sara@procsys.com: "Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?"
Maybe reply: sara@procsys.com: "Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?"
Maybe reply: sara@procsys.com: "Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > sda:sd.cBad block number/count requestedscsidisk I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
> > unable to read partition table
> >
> > It happens in kernel versions 2.2.12 and 2.2.14
> >
> > What should be done to make it working for 4096 size sectors?
>
> Try and find out what partition format broke the code
>

The message is coming from msdos_partition()

---

I've not enabled any optionaly partition formats. My configfile :

... # # Partition Types # # CONFIG_BSD_DISKLABEL is not set # CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION is not set # CONFIG_SMD_DISKLABEL is not set # CONFIG_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION is not set # CONFIG_NLS is not set

-Sa.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: sara@procsys.com: "Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?"
Previous message: Jonathan Case Nicklin: "Re: namei() query"
Next in thread: sara@procsys.com: "Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?"
Maybe reply: sara@procsys.com: "Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?"
Maybe reply: sara@procsys.com: "Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:13 EST