Re: IDE/ATAPI

From: Matthias Andree (ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)
Date: Wed Apr 19 2000 - 10:58:12 EST


* Mark Hahn (hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca) [000419 16:58]:
> > and if you want to give it a try. As to my experience, SCSI stuff is
> > usually smoother, particularly in respect to CPU load.
>
> please don't repeat this trite old falshood. modern ATA controllers
> are just as busmastering as decent SCSI cards.

So please name:
- ATA implementations that do tagged command queueing
- ATA implementations that do dis-/reconnect in the same channel
- the reason why you contradict observations.

To do busmastering, you also need a drive that actually offers this in
a decent manner. The Pioneer DR-A14S does not offer UDMA, just to name
one. The Plextor PX-32TS and PX-40TS offer 20 MXfers/s, my SYM53C875
seems to do decent busmastering.

I'll see if I can get hold of decent bonnie(++) figures, ripping my
systems apart and reconfiguring in case this is of interest, I'll
however not do so unless asked to.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST