Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 08:49:18 EST

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
Previous message: Sridhar Uravakonda: "hi"
In reply to: Stefan Monnier: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stefan Monnier wrote:
> In the same spirit, I think gcc should automatically get rid of `static'
> functions which are not called in the file.

Excepting special cases like __initcall and __setup of course

-- Jeff Garzik | Nothing cures insomnia like the Building 1024 | realization that it's time to get up. MandrakeSoft, Inc. | -- random fortune

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
Previous message: Sridhar Uravakonda: "hi"
In reply to: Stefan Monnier: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST