Re: I-Iopener/VIA Chipset problems - anyone working on this?

• Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"
• Previous message: Linda Walsh: "Re: return values - 32, 64, 128 bits, type defs...etc/platform size"
• In reply to: Ron Gage: "I-Iopener/VIA Chipset problems - anyone working on this?"
• Next in thread: Ron Gage: "Re: I-Iopener/VIA Chipset problems - anyone working on this?"
• Reply: Ron Gage: "Re: I-Iopener/VIA Chipset problems - anyone working on this?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Is anyone currently working on the problem of IDE drives not being properly
> recognized on Via based motherboards, specifically the I-Opener? Is there
> anything I can do to help? I have a modified I-Opener with a 6.4 gig IBM drive
> installed on it. It boots 2.2.14 just fine, but dies under 2.3.99pre5 with the
> 6-3pre patch (can't find init).

The current IDE driver code is broken on some VIA boards.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"
• Previous message: Linda Walsh: "Re: return values - 32, 64, 128 bits, type defs...etc/platform size"
• In reply to: Ron Gage: "I-Iopener/VIA Chipset problems - anyone working on this?"
• Next in thread: Ron Gage: "Re: I-Iopener/VIA Chipset problems - anyone working on this?"
• Reply: Ron Gage: "Re: I-Iopener/VIA Chipset problems - anyone working on this?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST