On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:44:42PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > Dave, what's up with sock_no_foo() stuff? Mind if I'll replace (some
> > of?) them with NULLs, taking the tests into net/socket.c?
> >
> > Please no, the whole point of the sock_no_*() stuff was to _REMOVE_
> > the tests from the socket.c code.
>
> Point taken, but I still want to look who calls them and how many PFs have
> non-default stuff in the first place. E.g. ->mmap() just looks wrong. Oh,
> well...
While you're playing with this stuff, I noticed that no-one actually has
anything in their fcntl method except sock_no_fcntl (net/core/sock.c).
Any objections to simply removing this field from the structure and
moving the body of sock_no_fcntl into sock_fcntl (net/socket.c)?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST