The bug was caused by me sleeping on a callback from ll_rw_block().
Jeff
Riley Williams wrote:
>
> Hi Andi.
>
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 04:24:39PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> >> The Oops I am seeing on 2.2.15 while doing pure Linux AIO is:
>
> >> Ooops: 0002
> >> CPU: 0
> >> EIP: 0010:[<8011358a>]
>
> > Looks strange. 80xxxxxx is a user mode address. Seems it
> > somehow jumped into nirvana.
>
> Just a thought, but is that running on a system compiled for 2G
> of RAM? If so, 80 would be a kernel mode address, if I'm reading
> the code correctly...
>
> Best wishes from Riley.
>
> * Copyright (C) 2000, Memory Alpha Systems.
> * All rights and wrongs reserved.
>
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
> | development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
> | in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
> | else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> * http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 21:00:07 EST