Re: [PATCH] 2.3.99-pre6-3+ VM rebalancing

From: Andrea Arcangeli (
Date: Tue Apr 25 2000 - 10:59:59 EST

On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

>If you look closer, you'll see that none of the swapped out
>stuff is swapped back in again. This shows that the VM
>subsystem did make the right choice here...

Swapping out with 50mbyte of cache isn't the right choice unless all the
50mbyte of cache were mapped in memory (and I bet that wasn't the case).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 21:00:09 EST