Re: under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL? (was Re: Why auditing and ACL's are important

From: Linda Walsh (law@sgi.com)
Date: Thu May 04 2000 - 00:58:17 EST

Next message: formulegagnante@hotmail.com: "This is for you"
Previous message: Linda Walsh: "Re: Linus: [PATCH] (for 2.3.99pre6) audit_ids system calls"
In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL? (was Re: Why auditing and ACL's are important"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL? (was Re: Why auditing and ACL's are important (was: audit_ids system calls))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> How many #ifdefs are you going to generate all over the kernel source tree?
> Is this realy so easylyseparated or will it touch 90% of all kernel files?

--- It may touch many files depending on how much auditing is implemented. #ifdefs are ugly though -- more likely is just inserting audit calls through-out that are just "#defined" to produce no code in the no-audit case. Much cleaner.

-l

-- Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: formulegagnante@hotmail.com: "This is for you"
Previous message: Linda Walsh: "Re: Linus: [PATCH] (for 2.3.99pre6) audit_ids system calls"
In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL? (was Re: Why auditing and ACL's are important"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL? (was Re: Why auditing and ACL's are important (was: audit_ids system calls))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST