On Thu, 04 May 2000 07:53:51 -0700,
Linda Walsh <law@sgi.com> wrote:
>Keith Owens wrote:
>> On Wed, 03 May 2000 17:22:45 -0700,
>> Linda Walsh <law@sgi.com> wrote:
>> >James Sutherland wrote:
>> >> The other potential problem is claiming interrupt 0x81 for the new 64-bit
>> >> syscall - I'd guess this SHOULD be ok, but is it??
>> > Could be asked of any interrupt vector. I know it wasn't used
>> >in any of the ia32 specific kernel code.
>>
>> Conflict! The SGI kernel debugging code (kdb) uses interrupt 0x81. It
>> is in kdb v0.6, kdb v1.1, the latest IKD patch and the SGI XFS code,
>> all of which have been released to the wild. Look for KDBENTER_VECTOR.
> Ok...any your alternate suggestion would be...?
<duck_question_mode> The next free one? </duck_question_mode>
I have not seen anything using vector 0x82.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST