Re: devfs persistence

From: Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 10:43:44 EST


Hi,

On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 09:17:55AM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> What about LVM? And which would you think is a "cleaner" solution: MD
> or LVM?

LVM is probably more appropriate as a pseudo-partitioning tool, but
I'm not sure if it has the same auto-start functionality that the
raid code currently has. Heinz, can LVM configure itself by scanning
partitions at kernel boot time without user-space intervention?

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST