Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 13:36:16 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Kernel crash [2.2.15]"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [OOPS] report for 2.3.99-pre7-5 on sparc64"
In reply to: Frank van Maarseveen: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Next in thread: Phillip Jones: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Frank van Maarseveen wrote:

> On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 09:35:24AM +1200, Craig Whitmore wrote:
> > With 2.3.99-pre6 (haven't checked any other versions)
> >
> > [root@lennon /proc]# more misc
> > Segmentation fault
> strace says:
> read(3, "135 rtc\n 1 psaux\n", 2) = 18

hmm, works for me.

pre7-4, pre6-1

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Kernel crash [2.2.15]"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [OOPS] report for 2.3.99-pre7-5 on sparc64"
In reply to: Frank van Maarseveen: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Next in thread: Phillip Jones: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST