>
> > > * spin waiting like this in general seems wrong anyway. can't we do
> > > better? can you sneak a schedule() call in there? anyway, IIRC Alan
> > > commented [about the 2.2.x IDE code] that it needed to be cleaned up,
> > > that the IDE<->SMP fix in place was really a band-aid.
> >
> > I agree, busy looping is always bad. Andre, do we really have to busy wait
> > here?
>
> Tell me when we want to NUKE legacy hardware........SUPPORT
> This would include ISA and possible ISA-PNP-IDE.........
won't make me very happy but if you need something tested on ISA I use it
here.
Bye
Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST