Re: [PATCH] Recent VM fiasco - fixed

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 06:15:37 EST

Next message: Matthias Urlichs: "Task locks ??"
Previous message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [PATCH] Recent VM fiasco - fixed"
In reply to: Simon Kirby: "Re: [PATCH] Recent VM fiasco - fixed"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Recent VM fiasco - fixed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Kirby wrote:

> Is Andrea taking a too dangerous approach for the current kernel
> version, or are you trying to get something extremely simple
> working instead?

You may want to read his patch before saying it does any good.

There probably are some good bits in the classzone patch, but
it also backs out bugfixes for bugs which have been proven to
exist and fixed by those fixes. ;(

It would be nice if Andrea could separate the good bits from
the bad bits and make a somewhat cleaner patch...

regards,

Rik

-- The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network of people. That is its real strength.

Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthias Urlichs: "Task locks ??"
Previous message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [PATCH] Recent VM fiasco - fixed"
In reply to: Simon Kirby: "Re: [PATCH] Recent VM fiasco - fixed"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Recent VM fiasco - fixed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST