Re: ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?

From: Simon Richter (Simon.Richter@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 09:37:56 EST

Next message: Mark Hahn: "Re: ATA on the move.....Answer to SCSI 3wks back"
Previous message: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz: "Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3? [OT]"
In reply to: Francis GALIEGUE: "ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?"
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 19 May 2000, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:

Yes, for ia64 and probably Alpha and PowerPC.

Simon

-- 
PGP public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc
 Fingerprint: 10 62 F6 F5 C0 5D 9E D8  47 05 1B 8A 22 E5 4E C1
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark Hahn: "Re: ATA on the move.....Answer to SCSI 3wks back"
Previous message: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz: "Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3? [OT]"
In reply to: Francis GALIEGUE: "ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?"
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST