Re: Can O_SYNC be implemented by using fsync?

From: Jesse Pollard (pollard@cats-chateau.net)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 13:54:04 EST


On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>Bill Wendling wrote:
>>
>> Also sprach Pavel Machek:
>>
>> }
>> I wouldn't count on that. If my failed patches were any indication, it's
>> heavily used by apps like Netscape...
>
>Why the hell is Netscape doing this? Netscape is a browser/mail
>program, not a multi-user database, or are you refering to the server
>side of NetScape? This doesn't sound right! Why would Netscape need to
>write-through files all the time -- for browser failover?

I believe it is for the certificate database - you wouldn't want it damaged
by software aborts - also the indexed history table. Yes, there is a
lock on the directory, but it looks like there is a foundation for a
shared history.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@cats-chateau.net

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST