Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
>
> This patch fixes a simple thinko in my last rtc patch which could in completely
> unlikely situations printk a wrong frequency value in rtc_dropped_irq (harmless
> but wrong anyway).
>
> I'm still a bit wary about putting printk inside a spinlock critical region.
> Comments?
If you don't want the printk inside a spinlock, you can always grab the
spinlock, store to a temporary, release the spinlock, and then do the
printk.
Also, make sure you increase the RTC when you do fixes as well as
feature updates...
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Liberty is always dangerous, but Building 1024 | it is the safest thing we have. MandrakeSoft, Inc. | -- Harry Emerson Fosdick- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST