[OT] Re: Linux on the TI-89/92[+]???

From: egger@suse.de
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 14:22:12 EST

Next message: David Wragg: "Re: PCI MMIO flushing and stuff (was Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt)"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Basic testing shows 2.3.99-pre9-3 bad, pre9-2 good"
In reply to: Kenneth C . Arnold: "Re: Linux on the TI-89/92[+]???"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Linux on the TI-89/92[+]???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 20 May, Kenneth C . Arnold wrote:

> Is there any document that explains what exactly is different between
> the dragonball and the M68000?

I don't know any although that doesn't mean much.... :)
Anyways, you can find further information about it
at http://199.104.132.208/ProdCat/psp/0,1250,MC68328~M934310090795,00.html

Simply grep for lines not containing MC68000 in it and you have all the
differences... :)

--

Servus, Daniel

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Wragg: "Re: PCI MMIO flushing and stuff (was Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt)"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Basic testing shows 2.3.99-pre9-3 bad, pre9-2 good"
In reply to: Kenneth C . Arnold: "Re: Linux on the TI-89/92[+]???"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Linux on the TI-89/92[+]???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST