Re: Capabilities bug(s) / implementation inconsistencies

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue May 23 2000 - 19:15:45 EST

Next message: t.n.vanderleeuw@chello.nl: "Re: pre9-4 OOM VM lockups"
Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: What's the TCP retransmission algorithm in Linux."
In reply to: Linda Walsh: "Capabilities bug(s) / implementation inconsistencies"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> /* Clear the capabilities if we switch to a non-root user */
> if (current->uid)
> cap_clear(current->cap_effective);
> else
> current->cap_effective = current->cap_permitted;

This is a bug. We now have capability flags to indicate 'capability aware'
applications and these should be getting checked as they now do in
setuid and friends

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: t.n.vanderleeuw@chello.nl: "Re: pre9-4 OOM VM lockups"
Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: What's the TCP retransmission algorithm in Linux."
In reply to: Linda Walsh: "Capabilities bug(s) / implementation inconsistencies"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:25 EST