Re: Unnumbered IP interfaces

From: John Payne (john@sackheads.org)
Date: Fri May 26 2000 - 06:16:00 EST


On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 09:31:24PM +0100, Carlos Morgado wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 09:40:32AM -0700, Ivan Passos wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Quick question: is it possible to have unnumbered IP interfaces in Linux??
> >
> > An unnumbered IP interface uses another if's IP in case it needs one (e.g.
> > a unnumbered PPP if may use the Ethernet IP).
> >
>
> What are you trying to do ? afaik unnumbered ifs are mostly useless except
> for bundling and bgp load share tricks. You probably want to look at the
> multilink ppp and isdn master/slave stuff.

If the box is a router and not generating any traffic (or at least very little
traffic), point-to-point interfaces don't need an address... or in the case that
they do generate traffic (ICMP unreach, etc) then they can use the address of
another interface as configured.

Just one way of reducing address-space wastage

-- 
John Payne      http://www.sackheads.org/jpayne/    john@sackheads.org
http://www.sackheads.org/uce/                    Fax: +44 870 0547954
Euro-folk register in the spam-fight -  http://www.euro.cauce.org/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:15 EST