Re: Announcing CML2, a replacement for the kbuild system

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 18:01:06 EST


On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 08:37:04PM -0700, david parsons wrote:

> The whoops-time-to-fork-the-linux-kernel showstopper for me is that
> the reference implementation of this new configuration language is
> written in Python, and, given the fluidity of linux kernel

That's not even funny. If you want to fork the kernel because of 1 buildtime
dependency, your priorities are messed up badly.

Regards,

bert hubert.

-- 
                       |              http://www.rent-a-nerd.nl
                       |                     - U N I X -
                       |          Inspice et cautus eris - D11T'95

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:20 EST