On May 30, ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de wrote:
> Chip Salzenberg <chip@valinux.com> writes:
>
> > According to Matthias Andree:
> > > Having unsuited accompanying user-space utils will definitely spoil
> > > that thing.
> >
> > Ah, not so much. For example, I only ever use NFSv2, myself, so older
> > mount binaries work just fine for me. And Trond's patches do a whole
> > lot more than just enable NFSv3.
>
> There's no point in merging non-tcp v3 NFS stuff unless it's actually
> used (client + server) so it can actually be tested in
> 2.2.16-pre, don't you think?
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Having full v3 support in the kernel might help encourage util-linux
to get up-to-date.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:23 EST