Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt

From: Dragan Stancevic (visitor@valinux.com)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 21:17:17 EST

Next message: Tom Berkley: "Re: sound..."
Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Slow development cycle"
Next in thread: Dragan Stancevic: "Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt"
Maybe reply: Dragan Stancevic: "Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, May 22, 2000, Donald Becker <becker@scyld.com> wrote:
; On Mon, 22 May 2000, Dragan Stancevic wrote:
;
; assured that it would still with 66Mhz chips, and it insured that
; both memory and I/O operations would have a bus arbitration cycle.

You have a point here...

I understand the double role of the inw there

-Dragan

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tom Berkley: "Re: sound..."
Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Slow development cycle"
Next in thread: Dragan Stancevic: "Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt"
Maybe reply: Dragan Stancevic: "Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:26 EST