Sasi Peter wrote:
> > As far as I know Linus hasn't made any decision regarding this matter and
> > the last thing I read was that he'd like a journaling fs in the 2.4
> > kernel.
>
> That is right, and I suppose it is because he also considers ReiserFS to
> be production quality.
>
> Correct me, if I have mistaken any facts (I really did not search the
> archives, have only used my memory).
<flamebait>
Does ReiserFS work with native RAID and/or NFS ? Last I checked there were
some issues... For me these are crucial "features", the only other FS which
has these problems and claims to be "production quality" is NWFS.
Personally I dislike FSs which introduce their own concepts rather than
reusing or extending existing ones. Once these "kludges" are in the kernel,
they are very very hard to change or remove them. If every journalling FS
brings it's own VFS-extensions (-interpretations ?), I think its impossible.
</flamebait>
Regards,
Okke Timm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:21 EST