Okke Timm wrote:
>
> Sasi Peter wrote:
> > > As far as I know Linus hasn't made any decision regarding this matter and
> > > the last thing I read was that he'd like a journaling fs in the 2.4
> > > kernel.
> >
> > That is right, and I suppose it is because he also considers ReiserFS to
> > be production quality.
> >
> > Correct me, if I have mistaken any facts (I really did not search the
> > archives, have only used my memory).
>
> <flamebait>
> Does ReiserFS work with native RAID and/or NFS ? Last I checked there were
> some issues... For me these are crucial "features", the only other FS which
> has these problems and claims to be "production quality" is NWFS.
knfsd crashes for both ext2 and reiserfs, alexei adamovich is working on
debugging that.
I understand that the raid that went into 2.4 works fine with reiserfs, if I
understand correctly it was the code that was rejected from the kernel that
didn't work with us for the reason that it was rejected for.
>
> Personally I dislike FSs which introduce their own concepts rather than
> reusing or extending existing ones.
You are one of the few persons with the courage to say this rather than just
think it, and I commend you for your courage.
> </flamebait>
>
> Regards,
> Okke Timm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:23 EST