On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, [ISO-8859-1] Gérard Roudier wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Stephen Torri wrote:
>
> > If we get ATA/100 then why buy SCSI?
>
> For better performance, superior reliability and flexibility ATA lacks by
> design.
Really and the $5 difference in the final electronics on the bottom of the
drive justifies this statement? All other parts are shared and
"IDENTICAL", this may be a FYI for you.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:23 EST