Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> How feasable would it be to extend CML2 and clean up the code base to
> avoid having to do a make dep / make clean to be reasonable sure stuff is
> consistent?
This is more in the realm of mkdep and the makefiles.
What lets everything down is the fact that mkdep doesn't handle nested
includes. So if you change something in, umm, include/asm/param.h then
your next kernel will mysteriously explode.
Take a look at include/config/* and *.o.flags. It's pretty sneaky. It
appears to provide everything you mention, as long as the dependency
generator can be taught to recur.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:23 EST