Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying

• Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.2.16pre{5,7}: loss of SCSI CDROM volume control"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: TODO List / State of CML2"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I understand that the raid that went into 2.4 works fine with reiserfs, if I
> > understand correctly it was the code that was rejected from the kernel that
> > didn't work with us for the reason that it was rejected for.
>
> The current 2.4.0-test RAID crashes a lot. It doesnt seem to matter what
> the underlying fs is

Thanks for the tip. I'll ask the ReiserFS FAQ maintainer to add your comment.

Apologies to anyone I unknowingly encouraged to use 2.4.0-test RAID.

Hans

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.2.16pre{5,7}: loss of SCSI CDROM volume control"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: TODO List / State of CML2"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:24 EST