On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
> > This really pisses me off in the worst way.....
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> This sort of situation is best handled with a level head. You must separate
> the GPL violation from anything else they do to annoy you.
>
> Get a copy of their CD and document that accurate source of GPL-derived
> code is not available, on a file-by-file basis, showing evidence that
> the code was modified and that the modifications are not available in
> source form. Make it available to others so that they can confirm your
> findings. Then, and only then, can can this be pursued with ABIT and
> anyone else who distributes the CD.
Will do it for both versions 1.0 and 2.0
> I don't care much about anything they happen to say about Red Hat. I doubt
> Red Hat cares much either. Likewise for what they write about Linux. All I'd
> like to hear is how compiled code doesn't match available source.
>
> You might find that emotionally difficult, but I can assure you that it is
> the only way to be effective in enforcing GPL violations.
Gurrr...... Your are right.
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:27 EST