Re: procfs vs. kernel threads (was: Re: test1-ac10 and bttv)

From: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 03:12:04 EST

Next message: David Howells: "Common Journalling API"
Previous message: Nils Philippsen: "Re: 8139too status (was Re: confirmation on 8139)"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: procfs vs. kernel threads (was: Re: test1-ac10 and bttv)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alexander Viro wrote:
> Right one is to have a mini-fs (quite possibly only with the root directory)
> and set it from the very beginning. Then all this special-case crap will go
> away. I'll do that - BTW, it will simplify the mount_root() big way.

YES !!!! Can't wait for chroot_fs_refs to die ;-)

Thanks,
- Werner

-- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH werner.almesberger@ica.epfl.ch / /_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Howells: "Common Journalling API"
Previous message: Nils Philippsen: "Re: 8139too status (was Re: confirmation on 8139)"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: procfs vs. kernel threads (was: Re: test1-ac10 and bttv)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:27 EST