Re: Common Journalling API

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 13:26:41 EST

Next message: Jason Venner: "Re: 'lock' modules?"
Previous message: Matan Ziv-Av: "Re: capabilities PATCH"
In reply to: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Common Journalling API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

willy@thepuffingroup.com said:
> that wouldn't really make sense. journalling is block-based. (ok,
> NTFS journalling isn't, but ext3, XFS, JFS, JFFS and ReiserFS all
> are.)

JFFS isn't. JFFS doesn't even run on top of a block device. It runs
directly on a Memory Technology Device.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jason Venner: "Re: 'lock' modules?"
Previous message: Matan Ziv-Av: "Re: capabilities PATCH"
In reply to: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Common Journalling API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:29 EST