Hi,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 10:56:17PM +0200, Juan J. Quintela wrote:
>
> >> I'd like to be able to keep stuff simple in the shrink_mmap
> >> "equivalent" I'm working on. Something like:
> >>
> >> if (PageDirty(page) && page->mapping && page->mapping->flush)
> >> maxlaunder -= page->mapping->flush();
>
> sct> That looks ideal.
>
> But this is supposed to flush that _page_, at least in the normal
> case.
All transactional filesystems will have ordering constraints which
the core VM cannot know about. In that case, the filesystem may
simply have no choice about cleaning and unpinning pages in a given
order. For actually removing a page from memory, evicting precisely
the right page is far more important, but for writeback, it's
controlling the amount of dirty/pinned data from the various different
sources which counts.
Cheers,
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST