On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Jones D (ISaCS) wrote:
> > This is a tidy-up change that makes the driver more
> > informative about the
> > reasons no microcode was actually updated (wrong family or no matching
> > chunk found).
>
> Hi Tigran,
>
> Now that we have access to MSRs from userspace, is there any reason
> this could not be done better there ?
>
yes, there is - the lack of ability to bind a userspace process to a CPU
is the main reason why I implemented it differently from the other
"classical" implementations.
Regards,
Tigran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST