"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
>
>
> LFS is a joke. Without an LP64 compilation environment, there is
> just no hope of getting a complete system with large file support.
LFS provides a fully functional 64-bit file capability for an ILP32
system. I've been using it for years...
> What are we supposed to do, declare plain open() obsolete?
LFS is fully usable with "plain open()" -- add O_LARGEFILE and use
lseek64(), truncate64(), fstat64(), fcntl64(), et al.
If that's unacceptable, you can also compile with _D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
and use your existing code, assuming you've used the documented opaque
types and have made sure your data structures and algorithms are correct
for terabyte files.
> IMHO the Alpha is the only sane answer.
That is *an* answer. So is Itanium. So is LFS, speaking from actual
production experience, that is.
-- David N. Lombard MSC.Software- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST