Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> Xuan, you write:
> > Is it reasonable to use the 50 bytes of /dev/nvram for logging or is it just
> > too small?
>
> It is definitely too small to write any transactions there, although it
> may be possible to use it for a bitmap of some sort (400 bits). However,
> my understanding would be that the CMOS NVRAM would be much too slow to
> use reasonably, and it only has a limited number of writes, so using it
> for part of a filesystem will surely mean death for it. Correct me if
> I'm wrong for modern motherboard NVRAM.
Motherboard NVRAM is battery-backed (it is part of the clock).
--Brian Gerst
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST