Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
> Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com> writes:
>
> > didn't Peter Anvin say recently that the reason the internal mount
> > instance of shmfs is mounted on "/" is todo with POSIX IPC requirements
> > that any object should correspond to a "real pathname"?
>
> And I've explained that he was wrong and misunderstoof the purpose of
> th shmfs. If this is the only reason please change it. As suggested,
> make it look like the pipefs mount point. I could live with that.
> But still would prefer it gets removed completely as soon as you mount
> it at a correct place.
>
All I said was that it has to be mounted onto a real path, i.e.
somewhere under the root (which it not *onto*! the root!)
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST