Re: [PATCH] per-cpu slab

From: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp
Date: Sat Jun 10 2000 - 09:19:11 EST

Next message: Philip Blundell: "[patch] plip unload problems"
Previous message: Tom Diehl: "Re: IDE Patches for 2.2.16 on Monday 6/12"
In reply to: Momchil Velikov: "Re: [PATCH] per-cpu slab"
Next in thread: Helge Hafting: "Re: [PATCH] per-cpu slab"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Momchil Velikov writes:
> kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp wrote:
> > Returning a block to the original CPU's slab requires extra cost for
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> Does you implementation has CPU-private slabs ?

I implemented not CPU-private slabs but per-CPU slab caches. Most
recently returned blocks are held in limited-depth stacks (LIFO).
Every slab has stacks for CPUs.

The system slab is accessed only when a stack overflow or underflow happens.

-- Computer Systems Laboratory, Fujitsu Labs. kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Philip Blundell: "[patch] plip unload problems"
Previous message: Tom Diehl: "Re: IDE Patches for 2.2.16 on Monday 6/12"
In reply to: Momchil Velikov: "Re: [PATCH] per-cpu slab"
Next in thread: Helge Hafting: "Re: [PATCH] per-cpu slab"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST