What this all boils down to is Alan knew perfectly well that Linus tentatively
planned to put reiserfs into 2.4.0, and yet Alan came out with a schedule in
which reiserfs was deferred until 2.5. Thus the squabble. Alan has come up
with an endless series of FUD reasons why ReiserFS should not go in, none of
them valid. If Alan wants to put in some better architecture for journaling,
fine, but reiserfs going in now does not prevent doing that. It is, after all,
GPL'd code.
Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST