Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sat Jun 10 2000 - 15:15:32 EST

Next message: Martin Frey: "Mmaping vmallocated memory to user space"
Previous message: S. Salman Ahmed: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2.16 CD errata"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Reply: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> It definitely needs review, especially by the original SuperMount author
> (sct?) Al Viro looked at one version of the patch and worried about
> races.

... and SCT was somewhat unhappy about the inode-based implementation
(<AOL></AOL> on that).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Frey: "Mmaping vmallocated memory to user space"
Previous message: S. Salman Ahmed: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2.16 CD errata"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Reply: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST