On Tue, 30 May 2000 narancs1@externet.hu wrote:
>
> On 30-May-2000 Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> Then stop wining, and patch it yourself.
> >
> > aww. That was a little harsh.
You you've ever know how much mail I get from guys that say 'XX isn't
support in your program, yould you implement it ??'
I'm always happy to add new features to my programs, but sometimes that's
impossible without doc's. In my case, Cryptocard support.
But it was a bit rude, I agree. I apologise.
> > At least he didn't mention devfs, OOM, other operating systems, release
> > schedules, open source philosophy or 3c59x tx timeouts.
>
> Ok, I'm lamer at kernel and C programming , as I am a sysadmin, don't have time
> for learning those stuff.
C programming goes fine, kernel a bit harder (I'm a newbie), bit I'm
learning. Falling a lot and standing up every time helps..
> I've just wondered, why not being able to use the innovations of 2.2.15,
> because I need the international patch for one of my servers.
>
> I don't want to hurry anybody, I don't mean to hurt noone.
>
> It was ONLY a question.
>
> 2.2.15 appeared "long ago", so I thought, the int. patch (at least some test
> one) is around somewhere.
>
> Igmar must have misunderstood my question. I wasn't complained about
> interrupts.
Well, I've had the same thing with the trustees patch : It's for 2.2.14,
and I have upgraded to 2.2.16 (due top the 'famous' bug).
Basically :
Patch it, and fix the rejected files. Most of the time easy, sometimes
not.
> Thanks for your great work in Linux and OSS!
> Narancs v1
Regards,
Igmar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST