In message <23229.960719252@ocs3.ocs-net> you write:
> And when gcc is fixed, change include/linux/init.h to remove the dummy
> reference. In the meantime, too many warnings are bad, they can hide
> real problems.
Jakub's superior patch for this problem (which did prototype checking
on the functions as well) was explicitly rejected by Linus in msg id
Pine.LNX.4.10.10004211629150.1198-100000@penguin.transmeta.com
================
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Rusty Russell wrote:L
>
> All the bogus warnings are pissing me off.
..which is why a gcc patch is in order. I've seen one floating around on
the gcc mailing lists, so I know it exists.
I don't like fixing gcc problems in the kernel, when the fix isn't
strictly necessary and a fix for the compiler _does_ exist.
Linus
================
Fork the kernel!
Rusty.
-- Hacking time.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:35 EST