Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jun 15 2000 - 11:48:10 EST

Next message: Huynh Hoang Vu: "Re: How to use X-Win32 5.0 to connect to linux."
Previous message: Markus Gutschke: "Re: Deadlock (Was: psaux device regression in 2.2.16)"
In reply to: George Sexton: "RE: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
Next in thread: Zdenek Kabelac: "Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
Maybe reply: Zdenek Kabelac: "Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > Does it work single processor
>
> One machine with a kernel compiled Uni-Processor would still exhibit the
> lock-ups with the 2.2.14 series. I have never tried physically removing a
> processor to see if the problem went away.

Physical removal isnt needed. A single CPU kernel leaves the other CPU
halted and offline.

> Intel 440BX

ok thats about as bugfree as they come.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Huynh Hoang Vu: "Re: How to use X-Win32 5.0 to connect to linux."
Previous message: Markus Gutschke: "Re: Deadlock (Was: psaux device regression in 2.2.16)"
In reply to: George Sexton: "RE: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
Next in thread: Zdenek Kabelac: "Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
Maybe reply: Zdenek Kabelac: "Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:10 EST