Re: It's time to get rid of zImage

From: Khimenko Victor (khim@sch57.msk.ru)
Date: Sat Jun 17 2000 - 19:46:41 EST


In <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006171917450.713-100000@labyrinth.local> Edward S. Marshall (emarshal@logic.net) wrote:
> [ Sorry for the delay in posting this; I've been in the midst of
> rebuilding my home network, and didn't have a chance to run any
> kind of tests to ensure that the problem is still there. -esm ]

> On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Unless someone gives me a *CONCRETE* example on a machine which *STILL*
>> doesn't boot bzImage (and boots zImage), I don't believe this statement
>> anymore.

> I am typing this on just such a machine. This is preventing my upgrading
> to 2.4.x, since I can't get a kernel built which fits as a zImage
> supporting the hardware in the machine plus the features I need (yes,
> everything that can be is a module), so I'm VERY interested in getting
> this solved now (previously, it was really just an annoyance). When
> booting from LILO, I get the following message when specifying a bzImage
> kernel:

> Block move error 0x02

... and when booting from GRUB or LoadLin ?

> Booting the exact same kernel configuration (the current round of testing
> is being done with 2.2.16, but it's the same error I've gotten since
> bzImage was first introduced) as it's zImage counterpart works just fine.

> I'm willing to run pretty much whatever tests people are interested in
> seeing, and can provide system specs for the machine (some of
> which I've attached below my signature). Current constraints are that the
> machine is purely Linux, so any tests involving other architectures will
> be...difficult. ;-)

> Let me know what you need.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST