On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>The buffer.c patch below is definately wrong.
>
>The reason for that is that the order in which the VM subsystem
>wants to have buffers flushed can be different than the order in
>which buffer.c wants to have the buffers flushed.
I'd prefer to reorder the dirty lru than having to stall (using WRITEA can
be someway effective too). If we stall there we end doing the work that
should instead belong to the `cp` in background. Comments?
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST