Rui Sousa wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > >To fix this, I followed (almost) the same technique as inodes_stat in
> > > >fs/inode.c, i.e. gathered variables in a structure called files_stat.
> > > >
> > > >Tested under 2.3.99-pre10-3 (aka 2.4.0-test1)
> > >
> > > Now, tested under 2.4.0-test2.
> >
> > I havent submitted that to Linus. As someone pointed out the guarantee is
> > not true for a struct either..
> >
> > If anything you need to use an array.
> >
>
> Are you saying that:
> struct foo
> {
> int x;
> int y;
> } bar;
>
> ((int *)&bar + 1) != &bar.y
>
> can sometimes be true?
I suspect this will always be true, at least unless x is not of type char...
>
>
> Rui Sousa
Xuân. :o)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:04 EST